By role
Platform engineersDesign the paths, review the draftsDevelopersAsk in a sentence, ship the same daySRE and on-callThe cause arrives with the alertHeads of platform and CTOsMake today’s problems impossible tomorrowBy company type
System integratorsForty clients, one practiceSoftware housesSaaS and on-premises, one releaseInfrastructure operatorsDatacenters, tenants, a hypervisor to leaveProductCompare
Good tools sit close to AGENTIKO and solve different problems. Here is where each one is the right choice, including when it is not us.
Does the AI only diagnose and suggest, or does it also author and operate? And does it run as someone else’s service, or inside your perimeter?
AssessmentAGENTIKO assessment from each vendor’s public product material, October 2026.
Qovery ships applications to your cloud from a SaaS control plane. AGENTIKO governs any resource from inside your cluster.
People need to ask for more than applications, and the control plane must stay yours.
The problem is shipping applications and preview environments, not governing resources.
| On what | AGENTIKO | Qovery |
|---|---|---|
| ScopeAny Kubernetes or cloud resource, not only applications | ✓ | · |
| Control plane in-houseAt every tier, not only on Enterprise | ✓ | · |
| LicenceApache 2.0, against GPL-3.0 for engine and console | ✓ | · |
| Preview environmentsOne per pull request, torn down on their own | · | ✓ |
| Application deliveryGit push to production | · | ✓ |
| Managed upgradesClusters upgraded by the vendor | · | ✓ |
Crossplane is a control engine with no interface. Upbound v3 gives agents a scoped identity on it. AGENTIKO ships the agents, the portal and the gate, inside your perimeter.
You want agents that already build, run and improve, and a portal people can use without writing YAML.
You need only the control plane and will build the experience elsewhere. It can also stay underneath.
| On what | AGENTIKO | Crossplane |
|---|---|---|
| Agents includedUpbound governs agents the customer must build | ✓ | · |
| Portal and cataloguePart of the product, not a separate project | ✓ | · |
| Self-service without YAMLA form, not custom resources | ✓ | · |
| Provider ecosystemBroader and more established multi-cloud coverage | · | ✓ |
| Control-plane depthMore options if you only provision | · | ✓ |
| CoexistenceBoth speak Kubernetes resources | = | = |
Komodor and Datadog Bits AI diagnose incidents and suggest fixes, as a service. AGENTIKO also builds and improves the platform, inside your perimeter, and fixes the declaration rather than the pod.
You want the incident fixed where it survives the next deploy, and the platform to learn from it.
You need faster triage on top of an observability stack you already run as SaaS.
| On what | AGENTIKO | Assistants |
|---|---|---|
| Builds the platformBlueprints, portal pages, integrations | ✓ | · |
| Fix on the declarationSurvives the next order | ✓ | · |
| Runs in-perimeterAgents inside your cluster | ✓ | · |
| Observability depthMature telemetry and dashboards | · | ✓ |
On a hosted sandbox with a sample company loaded. No cluster or card needed.
On a hosted sandbox with a sample company loaded. No cluster or card needed.
Every client is a different estate, and the best fixes live in the heads of a few senior engineers.
Friday, 17:40
AGENTIKO does the work
Reads the new client’s estate, its clusters, Terraform state and pipelines, maps it to the practice’s blueprints and drafts the onboarding as one change request in the client’s git.
A person decides
Your lead architect reviews the plan on Monday morning and merges it. Onboarding starts the same day.
Tuesday, 03:12
AGENTIKO does the work
Diagnoses inside that client’s perimeter, under that client’s policies. Prepares the cause, the evidence and an ordered fix, and drafts the client’s morning report.
A person decides
Your on-call engineer approves from the phone. The client reads who decided, and on what evidence.
Thursday, 02:00
AGENTIKO does the work
The nightly review finds the same health-check fault in eleven other client environments and proposes the fix as a blueprint update for each of them. It ships inert.
A person decides
Your practice lead chooses which clients receive it, and when.
Your best architect’s judgment, applied to every client.
Developers wait for environments, and every regulated customer who installs on premises turns a release into a project.
Monday, 09:10
AGENTIKO does the work
A developer asks in a sentence. The agent follows the golden path the platform team approved: namespace, database, pipeline and a preview address, validated before it applies.
A person decides
The platform team approved the path once. Every order after that runs inside it, and anything outside it comes back as a proposal.
Wednesday, 11:00
AGENTIKO does the work
Drafts the install for that bank’s target, names every key it needs without reading any, and runs a server-side dry run against the bank’s own policies.
A person decides
The bank’s administrator approves in the bank’s git. The secrets stay with the bank.
Saturday, 22:05
AGENTIKO does the work
Correlates logs, metrics and the tenant’s declaration, cites the file it read and proposes the fix with its rollback.
A person decides
The developer on call approves, verifies, and goes back to Saturday night.
Product engineers spend their hours on the product.
The entities want cloud speed, the law wants the data at home, and the hypervisor renewal grows every year.
First quarter
AGENTIKO does the work
Inventories machines and their dependencies, groups them into migration waves towards Kubernetes and Proxmox, and drafts each wave as a change request with its rollback.
A person decides
Your operations lead signs each wave. Every move has a name next to it.
Any working day
AGENTIKO does the work
Drafts it from the service catalogue. Residency, quotas and network rules are enforced by the control plane before anything applies.
A person decides
The entity’s owner approves. The platform refuses whatever the rules forbid, whoever asks.
Every night, 02:00
AGENTIKO does the work
The nightly review reads queue telemetry and the day’s incidents, then proposes alerts, sizing and documentation changes. It holds no tools.
A person decides
Your capacity planner reads the proposals with the morning coffee and adopts what makes sense.
A sovereign cloud catalogue, with the record an auditor asks for.